Feasibility and acceptability of virtual mock oral examinations for senior vascular surgery trainees and implications for the certifying exam.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the cancellation of in-person testing across the country. We sought to understand the feasibility of conducting virtual oral examinations as well as solicit opinions of vascular surgery program directors (PD) regarding the use of virtual platforms to conduct both low stakes mock oral examinations with their trainees and potentially "real" high stakes certifying examinations (CE) moving forward. METHODS: Forty-four senior vascular surgery trainees from 17 institutions took part in a virtual mock oral examination conducted by 38 practicing vascular surgeons via Zoom. Each examination lasted 30 minutes with four clinical scenarios. An anonymous survey pertaining to the conduct of the examination and opinions on feasibility of using virtual examinations for the vascular surgery CE was sent to all examiners and examinees. A similar survey was sent to all vascular surgery program directors. RESULTS: The overall pass rate was 82% (36/44 participants) with no correlation with training paradigm. 32/44 (73%) of trainees, 29/38 (76%) of examiners and 49/103 (48%) of PDs completed the surveys. Examinees and examiners thought the experience was beneficial and PDs also thought the experience would be beneficial for their trainees. While the majority of trainees and examiners believed they were able to communicate and express (or evaluate) knowledge and confidence as easily virtually as in person, PDs were less likely to agree confidence could be assessed virtually. The majority of respondents thought the CE of the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery could be offered virtually, although no groups thought virtual exams were superior to in person exams. While cost benefit was perceived in virtual examinations, the security of the examination was a concern. CONCLUSIONS: Performing virtual mock oral examinations for vascular surgery trainees is feasible. Both vascular surgery trainees as well as PDs feel that virtual CEs should be considered by the Vascular Surgery Board.

Vascular surgery triage during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in a marked increase in hospital usage, medical resource scarcity, and rationing of surgical procedures. This has created the need for strategies to triage surgical patients. We have described our experience using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) COVID-19 guidelines for triage of vascular surgery patients in an academic surgery practice. METHODS: We used the ACS guidelines as a framework to direct the triage of vascular surgery patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We retrospectively analyzed the results of this triage during the first month of surgical restriction at our hospital. Patients undergoing surgery were identified by reviewing the operating room schedule. We reviewed the electronic medical records (EMRs) and assigned an ACS category, condition, and tier class to each completed surgery. Surgeries that were postponed during the same period were identified from a prospectively maintained list. We reviewed the EMRs for all postponed surgeries and assigned an ACS category, condition, and tier class to each surgery. We reviewed the EMRs for all postponed procedures to identify any adverse events related to the treatment delay. RESULTS: We performed 69 surgeries in 52 patients during the study period. All surgeries were performed to treat emergent, urgent, or time-sensitive elective diagnoses. Of the 69 surgeries, 47 (68%) were from tier 3 and 22 (32%) from tier 2b. We did not perform any surgeries from tier 1 or 2a. We postponed surgery for 66 patients during the same period, of which 36 (55%) were from tier 1, 22 (33%) from tier 2a, 5 (8%) from tier 2b, and 3 (5%) could not be assigned a tier class. No tier 3 surgeries were postponed. Of the 66 patients, 3 (4.5%) experienced an adverse event that could be attributed to the treatment delay. CONCLUSIONS: The ACS triage guidelines provided an effective method to decrease vascular surgical volumes during the COVID-19 pandemic without an increase in patient morbidity. We believe the clinical utility of the guidelines would be strengthened by incorporating the SURGCON/VASCCON (surgical activity condition/vascular activity condition) threat level alert system.